Pages

Thursday 31 October 2019

Seventy percent of US Millennials say they are likely to vote socialist

The fourth annual report on “US Attitudes Toward Socialism, Communism, and Collectivism,” commissioned by the anticommunist Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation and conducted by YouGov, found a sharp growth in interest in socialism among youth in the US over the past year.
The study has been conducted annually since 2016 and bases itself on interviews with over 2,000 people.

This years’ results reveal a significant radicalization taking place among youth, particularly in the Millennial Generation (those aged 23-38) and Gen Z (aged 16-22). Compared to last year’s report, favorable views of capitalism dropped 6 percentage points and 8 percentage points for Gen Z and Millennials, respectively.
Other notable findings include:
* 70 percent of Millennials say they would be “somewhat likely” or “extremely likely” to vote for a socialist candidate. The percentage of Millennials who say they would be extremely likely to vote for a socialist candidate has doubled (from 10 percent in 2018 to 20 percent in 2019).
* Overall, 83 percent say they know at least a little about socialism, and 39 percent of Americans say they “know a lot”—a nearly 40 percent increase from 2018.
* Nearly half of Millennials think the government should provide a job to everyone who wants to work but cannot find it.
* Forty percent of Americans (45 percent of Gen Z and Millennials) think all higher education should be free.
* Around one in five Millennials thinks society would be better off if all private property were abolished.
* Seventy percent of Americans say the divide between the rich and the poor is a serious issue.
* Of the more than half (63 percent) of Americans who think the highest earners are “not paying their fair share,” 54 percent think increased taxes are part of the answer, and 47 percent say a complete change of the economic system is needed.
* Thirty-seven percent of Millennials think the US is one of the most unequal societies in the world.
* Over a quarter of Americans across all generations said Donald Trump is the biggest threat to world peace.
The source of this radicalization is not hard to find. The chief characteristic of life for Millennials and Gen Z has been skyrocketing social inequality. Many are forced to work two, three or even four jobs to make ends meet. One in five millennials is living below the poverty line.
The growing interest in and support for socialism coincides with a significant growth of class struggle and social protest internationally. In Lebanon, massive protests have brought an estimated one quarter of the country’s six million people onto the streets. In Chile, millions of people continue to flood the streets protesting social inequality and state violence in the largest demonstrations in the country’s history.
In the US, the strike by 32,000 Chicago teachers and support staff is in its second week, following the largest autoworker strike in 30 years by GM workers.
This eruption of the class struggle on a global scale terrifies the ruling class. They are acutely aware of social tensions and the growing interest in socialism.
The response of the Trump administration has been an open turn towards fascistic and authoritarian forms of rule. His hysterical denunciations of socialism, now a feature of nearly every rally, express the growing fear of the rich that demands for social reform will set off a mass movement for social equality.
On the other hand, the Democrats, speaking for another faction of the ruling elite, are determined to avoid anything that would mobilize popular anger against Trump. They are systematically keeping out of their impeachment inquiry any reference to Trump’s brutal crackdown on immigrants and refugees, unending war and the social catastrophe confronting workers and youth. Instead, they have focused their impeachment campaign on issues of foreign policy.
It is within this framework that the Democratic Party’s elevation of figures such as Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez must be understood. In order to provide a left cover for their right-wing policies, these self-proclaimed “socialists” have been brought forward to direct growing social anger back behind the Democratic Party.
In this latest campaign rally in Detroit on Sunday, Sanders once again directed his remarks against social inequality, listing many of the social ills confronting workers and youth. Most significant, however, was what was not said.
Sanders made no reference to the more than month-long strike by General Motors workers, which was just shut down by the United Auto Workers on the basis of a contract that facilitates the massive expansion of temporary workers, which has become the “new normal” for young people. Sanders also made no reference to the ongoing Chicago teachers strike.
The omissions were not accidental. The Democratic Party, through figures like Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, propose a “socialism” (though they almost never use the word) that does not involve the class struggle. Ending the domination of the “billionaire class” is supposedly to be achieved without any mass social movement or any challenge to the economic domination of the capitalist class.
And it is supposedly to be done within the framework of the Democratic Party, which is no less responsible than the Republicans for the social conditions confronting workers and young people.
The critical question is to build a socialist leadership in the working class and youth, to explain what genuine socialism is and how it must be fought for. The fight for socialism means the fight to establish democratic control of the giant banks and corporations by the working class. It means an end to social inequality through a radical redistribution of wealth and the expropriation of the ill-gotten gains of the corporate and financial aristocracy. It means an end to war and abolition of the military-intelligence apparatus.
The foundation for a socialist movement is the working class, in the United States and internationally. The reorganization of economic life on a world scale, on the basis of social need, not private profit, requires the independent mobilization of the working class to take power and establish a workers’ government.
This is the perspective fought for by the Socialist Equality Party and its youth organization, the International Youth and Students for Social Equality. We urge all those who want to take up the fight for socialism to join the SEP and the IYSSE.

The most populous state in the U.S. is on fire, and Donald Trump hasn't said a word

As Californian officials continue their battle against wildfires in the southern half of the West Coast, President Donald Trump has still yet to address the roughly 300 blazes that have broken out across the state over the past week.

There are at least 7 active large fires burning in California, which has so far covered around 97,500 acres. The National Weather Service issued its first-ever "Extreme Red Flag Warning" on Tuesday evening local time amid the ongoing blazes, with Santa Ana winds that "could be one of the strongest of recent memory" for most of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.

In recent months, the Trump administration has routinely targeted the homeless communities in San Francisco and Los Angeles as California continues to burn. According to experts, the president's push to roll back climate policies could worsen the Golden State's chances of increased natural disasters in the future. Last week, 50,000 Los Angeles residents were forced to evacuate their homes and most schools in San Fernando Valley were closed over safety concerns.

However, Trump has yet to publicly address the latest fires. In the past, the president has repeatedly blamed "gross mismanagement" for the devastating fires that have plagued the state. The latest Trump tweet about California's fires was shared in January.

"Billions of dollars are sent to the State of California for Forest fires that, with proper Forest Management, would never happen," the president wrote. "Unless they get their act together, which is unlikely, I have ordered FEMA to send no more money. It is a disgraceful situation in lives & money!"  

Months earlier, in November 2018, Trump had claimed that "there is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor."

Trump's remarks drew criticism from state officials and leaders of firefighters' organizations, with some accusing the president of focusing on politics while lives were at risk. His claims were also quickly debunked by scientists who say that most of the areas affected were outside of a forest and that climate change has fostered the conditions for the fires to thrive.

"Climate change is causing warmer temperatures, which dry out vegetation more," University of New Mexico biology professor Matthew Hurteau wrote in The Guardian. "It is also causing winter precipitation to fall over a shorter period and the length of the fire season is increasing. Vegetation in California is increasingly primed for fire."

Former Democratic Governor Jerry Brown on Tuesday condemned the Trump administration's push to water down Obama-era standards for fuel efficiency. "This is not just another legislative game here," Brown told the House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on Environment, according to the Washington Post.

"This is life-and-death stuff. And climate change is related to the fires in California. California is burning while the deniers make a joke out of the standards that could protect us all."

Lt. Col. Vindman testified he believed Trump blocked military aid to Ukraine in an attempt to force Ukrainian President Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into Biden’s family

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman testified Tuesday that he believed President Trump blocked military aid to Ukraine in an attempt to force Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to publicly announce an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden’s family, according to CNN.
Vindman said he believed there was a quid pro quo in place by July 10 after a meeting between American and Ukrainian officials. During the meeting, Vindman said Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland told Ukrainian officials they needed to ensure “specific investigations in order to secure the meeting” with Trump.
The alleged quid pro quo came just two weeks before the July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky. 
In a subsequent meeting of U.S. officials, Vindman testified, "Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma," the natural gas company where Biden’s son served on the board.
Vindman said he was not convinced the president was personally holding up the $400 million in U.S. military aid until the next month, when then-national security adviser John Bolton asked him to prepare a decision memo recommending to Trump that he release the funds.
Following a meeting of administration officials on Aug. 16, at which Vindman was not present, he learned Trump was still holding up the aid, which suggested to him that Trump was still waiting for a public announcement of an investigation. 
Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), one of Trump’s most vocal defenders in the House, reportedly pressed Vidman on his past meetings with Ukrainian government officials and asked him why he had not complied with orders to pressure the nation to investigate the Bidens. Vindman responded that he considered the order improper, according to CNN, citing a source present at the deposition.
Zeldin told CNN the source’s description of the exchange was “100% untrue, and that's why you should be able to watch these depositions live.” 

Jimmy Kimmel rips Trump with mash up of his national address on al-Baghdadi's death and Obama announcing bin Laden had been killed

Jimmy Kimmel has ripped into President Donald Trump by comparing his announcement of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's death with that of Barack Obama's statement on the killing of Osama bin Laden. 
The late night host created a mash up of Trump and Obama's televised national addresses following the killings of the Al Qaeda and ISIS leaders. 
The hilarious clip has already been viewed more than nine million times since Kimmel shared it online on Tuesday.  
Barack Obama during his 2011 address of Osama bin Laden's death
Donald Trump on Sunday during his address of death of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
Jimmy Kimmel created a mash up of Trump and Obama's televised national addresses following the killings of the Al Qaeda and ISIS leaders
Kimmel noted that Obama's address in 2011 following bin Laden's death in Pakistan lasted less than 10 minutes. 
Trump, however, spoke for 48 minutes on Sunday when he revealed that U.S. forces had killed Baghdadi in Syria. 
The video mashing lines from each of their addresses highlighted how vastly different each leader chose to share news of the deaths. 
The short clip started with Obama saying: 'The United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden.'
It was spliced with footage of Trump bluntly saying: 'Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is dead.' 
The video jumped back to Obama speaking of the raid on bin Laden's compound: 'The United States launched a targeted operation against that compound.' 
Kimmel noted that Obama's address in 2011 following bin Laden's death in Pakistan lasted less than 10 minutes
Trump, however, spoke for 48 minutes on Sunday when he revealed that U.S. forces had killed Baghdadi in Syria
Kimmel noted that Obama's address in 2011 following bin Laden's (left) death in Pakistan lasted less than 10 minutes. Trump, however, spoke for 48 minutes on Sunday when he revealed that U.S. forces had killed Baghdadi (right) in Syria

Trump continued: 'They did a lot of shooting and they did a lot of blasting, even not going through the front door. You know, you would think you go through the door. If you're a normal person, you say, 'Knock, knock. May I come in?'' 
'After a fire fight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body,' Obama said.
Trump followed up in the video saying: 'He died like a dog.'
Obama went on to say: 'His death does not mark the end of our effort.'
'A beautiful dog, a talented dog,' Trump said in reference to the K-9 fighter that was injured during the capture of Baghdadi.
'We give thanks to the men who carried out this operation,' Obama said. 
Trump continued: 'I don't get any credit for this, but that's OK. I never do. But here we are.' 

Trump tweets photoshop of military dog being awarded the Medal of Honor, and the internet is in full meltdown mode

Critics of President Donald Trump went into full meltdown mode after he tweeted a photoshopped image of the heroic military dog from the ISIS raid being awarded the Medal of Honor.

"AMERICAN HERO!" the president tweeted enthusiastically in all capital letters.


Trump was celebrating the unnamed military dog who corned ISIS terror leader al-Baghdadi and forced him to detonate a suicide vest. The dog was slightly injured in the blast.
What was likely meant as a humorous photoshop was taken as a deathly serious matter by those less serious elements of social media.
"Trump's photoshopped image disrespects all brave Americans who have served in our military," tweeted liberal activist Scott Dworkin. 
The New Yorker staff writer Naomi Fry responded, "omg trump pinned a tweet about the dog AGAIN." 
"Trump, bro, this is beyond gross. This is obviously photoshopped. It's not even a meme or something funny to laugh at because the subject material is plausible for many people who do not examine the picture carefully and don't notice the unnatural lines and silhouettes," responded Trump critic Eugene Gu.
Some mainstream media news outlets also took umbrage at the photoshop image. 

Supporters of the president and other critics of the news media took the opportunity to mock journalists and present the episode as the latest example of bias against Trump.

Here's more about the hero dog: 

Twitter stock plummets after CEO Jack Dorsey announces ban on political advertising

Twitter's stock price plummeted after CEO Jack Dorsey announced that the popular microblogging platform would be banning political advertising.
Dorsey tweeted the announcement on Wednesday.
"We've made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally," he tweeted. "We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought." 
"Why? A few reasons," he continued in a sequence of tweets.
"A political message earns reach when people decide to follow an account or retweet. Paying for reach removes that decision, forcing highly optimized and targeted political messages on people. We believe this decision should not be compromised by money," he explained.
He continued on to head off the possible argument that the decision would undermine free speech.
"A final note. This isn't about free expression," Dorsey explained. "This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today's democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It's worth stepping back in order to address."
Dorsey was likely pushed towards the decision by Facebook's recent and very public controversy over their policy to allow political advertisements to push what could be documented as falsehoods.
CNBC noted, on Twitter, that the company's stock fell by more than 2 percent in after-hours trading after the announcement, and at one point was as much as 4 percent lower.

Here's a news video about the announcement: 

Turning Point USA blasts white nationalist, homophobic 'trolls' who 'sabotaged' event Q&A

Turning Point USA President Charlie Kirk and TPUSA contributor Rob Smith pushed back against white nationalist and anti-gay "trolls" who "sabotaged" the Q&A portion of a "Culture War LIVE" event at Ohio State University on Tuesday night.
Benny Johnson, the organization's chief creative officer, noted the following on Twitter:

Smith — a gay, black conservative who served in the Iraq War and notes in his Twitter bio that he's "proudly despised by leftists AND the alt-right!" — helped Kirk slap down a number of inappropriate questions.

Another questioner asked Kirk and Smith how America could maintain "white" values, and Kirk decried the premise, telling the individual, "I find that to be a racist question" and "I do not think that America should become a white ethno-state," adding he considers such a view a "fringe perspective."
Kirk also said he'd been getting that type of question over the last few weeks — and indeed Washington Examiner reporter Jerry Dunleavy tweeted that "a bunch of Holocaust deniers and other assorted anti-Semites and Alt-Righters are targeting Turning Point USA events under the guise of 'free speech.' It's transparent bulls**t and should be rejected outright, no matter what you think of Charlie Kirk."
You can check out the full video of the event below.  

Cuban democratic socialists: AOC-backed group is actually a communist ‘imposter’

A group of Cuban democratic socialists have a message for their American counterparts: You are either secret communists or you are profoundly ignorant.
 
In an open letter, nine democratic socialists on the island blasted the Democratic Socialists of America, the U.S. group that counts Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) among its members, for supporting the island's Communist government.

What are the details?

During their annual convention in August in Atlanta, the Democratic Socialists of America formally approved a resolution declaring itself "in solidarity with the Cuban socialist struggle" and "opposing acts of imperialist aggression" against the island.
However, as Cuban democratic socialists point out, the DSA is contradicting itself by supporting the kind of military dictatorship they claim to oppose:
The support for Castroism revealed in resolution 62 of the recent Convention of the Democratic Socialists of the United States, held in Atlanta, Georgia, can only be explained by two reasons: either the American Socialist Democrats do not know the Cuban reality or they are not socialist or democratic.
The nine Cubans added:
Whoever stands in solidarity with that regime doesn't know it, doesn't know what is happening in Cuba or is [an] imposter as Castroism. Several Cuban democratic socialists, who have been facing the anti-popular, totalitarian and anti-socialist policies of Castroism for decades, for which some of us have suffered repression and exile, reject any kind of solidarity with the Castro regime and we do not share the defense of it carried out in that convention for supposed or poorly informed US democratic socialists.

No, it's not what they have in Europe

The letter by Cuba's democratic socialists may surprise Americans who have been misled into believing that "democratic socialism" is the kind of system commonly found in northern Europe. Contrary to what progressive groups and reporters such as MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle and Univision's Jorge Ramos have argued, U.S. democratic socialists are not the equivalent of Scandinavian social democrats.
As numerous economists and the former Danish prime minister have pointed out, the so-called Nordic model is fundamentally capitalist with higher taxes to fund a large welfare state. Conversely, groups like DSA are openly advocating for an end to free markets, which would mean a transition to an economy that more closely resembles that of countries like Cuba and Venezuela.

Will Americans listen?

Prominent democratic socialists are not exactly coy about their plans.
DSA member Meagan Day wrote last year, "I'm a staff writer at the socialist magazine Jacobin and a member of DSA, and here's the truth: In the long run, democratic socialists want to end capitalism."
Meanwhile, during a 2018 radio interview, the group's executive director openly called for an elimination of private property and nationalizing (government ownership) of major industries. As the founding editor of the socialist magazine Jacobin and DSA's vice-chairman pointed out, American democratic socialists want "a militant labor movement and a mass socialist presence strengthened by accumulated victories, looking to not merely tame but overcome capitalism."
This is consistent with Ocasio-Cortez's recent call for "public ownership" of private property during a rally announcing her endorsement for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
American Democratic Socialists are clear about their goals — even socialists in Communist Cuba are calling them out as closet-communist phonies.
Will Democrats and the media listen and stop misleading the public?

Bartender wins $50,000 after getting a lottery ticket for a tip

A bartender in Missouri got a massive tip when a customer left her a winning lottery ticket worth $50,000.
It would sound like an unusual item to receive as a tip, but winner and Bleacher's Bar staff member Taylor Russey told the Missouri Lottery that this was a normal occurrence for this particular customer.
"One of the regulars will buy the rest of the regulars in the bar lottery tickets every now and then, especially when it's high," Russey said. "And he did that on Saturday -- he bought all of us lottery tickets."
    The next day the staff found out that a winning lottery ticket was purchased at their bar. Russey said she even joked about it, not knowing it was her that held the ticket.
    "I was like, 'Guys, who won all this money and didn't tell anybody?'" Russey recalled.
      She then remembered the tip and scanned her ticket, only to find that she was the one who was now $50,000 richer.
      The ticket matched four of the five white-ball numbers drawn on Oct. 19, plus the Powerball, the lottery said. It was the 40th $50,000 winner sold in Missouri and only the second one this year.

      Police blew up an innocent man’s house in search of an armed shoplifter. Too bad, court rules.

      When they were finished, it looked as though the Greenwood Village, Colo., police had blasted rockets through the house.
      Projectiles were still lodged in the walls. Glass and wooden paneling crumbled on the ground below the gaping holes, and inside, the family’s belongings and furniture appeared thrashed in a heap of insulation and drywall. Leo Lech, who rented the home to his son, thought it looked like al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s compound after the raid that killed him.
      But now it was just a neighborhood crime scene, the suburban home where an armed Walmart shoplifting suspect randomly barricaded himself after fleeing the store on a June afternoon in 2015. For 19 hours, the suspect holed up in a bathroom as a SWAT team fired gas munition and 40-millimeter rounds through the windows, drove an armored vehicle through the doors, tossed flash-bang grenades inside and used explosives to blow out the walls.
      The suspect was captured alive, but the home was utterly destroyed, eventually condemned by the City of Greenwood Village.
      That left Leo Lech’s son, John Lech — who lived there with his girlfriend and her 9-year-old son — without a home. The city refused to compensate the Lech family for their losses but offered $5,000 in temporary rental assistance and for the insurance deductible.
      Now, after the Leches sued, a federal appeals court has decided what else the city owes the Lech family for destroying their house more than four years ago: nothing.
      On Tuesday, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit unanimously ruled that the city is not required to compensate the Lech family for their lost home because it was destroyed by police while they were trying to enforce the law, rather than taken by eminent domain.
      The Lechs had sued under the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause, which guarantees citizens compensation if their property is seized by the government for public use. But the court said that Greenwood Village was acting within its “police power” when it damaged the house, which the court said doesn’t qualify as a “taking” under the Fifth Amendment. The court acknowledged that this may seem “unfair,” but when police have to protect the public, they can’t be “burdened with the condition” that they compensate whomever is damaged by their actions along the way.
      “It just goes to show that they can blow up your house, throw you out on the streets and say, ‘See you later. Deal with it,’ ” Leo Lech said in an interview with The Washington Post on Tuesday. “What happened to us should never happen in this country, ever.”
      Leo Lech said he is considering appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court. Police must be forced to draw the line at some point, he said — preferably before a house is gutted — and be held accountable if innocent bystanders lose everything as a result of the actions of law enforcement.
      In a statement to The Post, a spokeswoman for Greenwood Village said the city never refused to help the Lechs, saying the family was “very well insured” and refused the $5,000 assistance for out-of-pocket expenses before insurance kicked in. The spokeswoman, Melissa Gallegos, applauded the 10th Circuit’s ruling.
      “The house was being used as a barricade, and the damage done to it was to remove the barricade and get the gunman out without any loss of life," Gallegos said. "That is not a use of another’s property under eminent domain, but a use of another’s property during a police emergency.”
      In June 2015, the standoff at Lech’s suburban Denver home captivated and alarmed the public, as their house at the end of the street, one located by a baseball field complex and a park, suddenly turned into a quasi-war zone.
      The suspect, Robert Jonathan Seacat, had stolen a shirt and a couple of belts from a Walmart in neighboring Aurora, Colo., and then fled in a Lexus, according to a police affidavit. A police officer pursued him in a high-speed chase until Seacat parked his car near a light rail station, hopped a nearby fence leading to the interstate, and then crossed five lanes of traffic on foot. He climbed the fence on the other side — and then, shortly thereafter, came upon the Lech residence.
      A 9-year-old boy, John Lech’s girlfriend’s son, was home alone at the time, waiting for his mom to return from the grocery store, Lech said. He told police he was watching YouTube videos in his room when he heard the alarm trip, according to the affidavit. He emerged to find a man walking up the stairs, holding a gun. “He said, ‘I don’t want to hurt anybody. I just want to get away,' " Lech said. Minutes later, the boy walked out of the house unharmed.
      Seacat then began searching the house for car keys. But by the time he got in the car parked in Lech’s garage, police had pulled into the driveway. Seacat fired a shot at them through the garage, the affidavit says.
      Thus began the 19-hour standoff.
      “They proceed to destroy the house — room by room, by room, by room,” Lech said. “This is one guy with a handgun. This guy was sleeping. This guy was eating. This guy was just hanging out in this house. I mean, they proceeded to blow up the entire house.”
      SWAT officers attempted to enter the home on one occasion but retreated after believing they heard Seacat fire several rounds. After other tactics, including tear gas, robots and police negotiations, repeatedly failed, SWAT officers tried again to enter the home at 8:21 the next morning. They found him holed up in a bathroom with a stash of drugs, where he was disarmed and arrested.
      When the Lech family was allowed back on the property to retrieve their belongings, they were aghast at what they found.
      John Lech, his girlfriend and her son moved in with Leo Lech and his wife, who lived 30 miles away, requiring John to change jobs. The $5,000 offered by the city “was insulting,” Leo Lech said.
      His expenses to rebuild the house and replace all its contents cost him nearly $400,000, he said. While insurance did cover structural damage initially, his son did not have renter’s insurance and so insurance did not cover replacement of the home’s contents, and he says he is still in debt today from loans he took out.
      “This has ruined our lives,” he said.
      Gallegos stressed that any large expenses Lech incurred are because he chose to do more than necessary, and chose to “repour the foundation that wasn’t damaged, and [build] a bigger better house where the old one stood.” Lech insisted starting from scratch was necessary.
      Previously, police have defended their actions during the standoff.
      “My mission is to get that individual out unharmed and make sure my team and everyone else around including the community goes home unharmed,” Greenwood Village Police Commander Dustin Varney said in 2015, KUSA reported. “Sometimes that means property gets damaged, and I am sorry for that.”
      State and federal courts have ruled differently in cases involving innocent homeowners caught in deadly police raids, although the 10th Circuit was more persuaded by courts ruling in police’s favor.
      Lech’s lawyers pointed to a 1991 Minnesota case in which the state Supreme Court sided with a woman whose house was damaged by police with tear gas as they sought to apprehend a suspect. In a 1980 Houston case, the Texas Supreme Court sided with a couple whose home was badly damaged as police sought to apprehend three suspects who barricaded themselves inside.
      In that case, the Texas court turned up its nose at the principle the 10th Circuit stuck to so closely in its ruling: that unless a government’s action is clearly labeled “eminent domain,” citizens aren’t entitled to compensation if the police destroy their property as a matter of business.
      “This court has moved beyond the earlier notion that the government’s duty to pay for taking property rights is excused by labeling the taking as an exercise of police powers,” the Texas court wrote at the time.
      Today, the Leches’ Greenwood Village home has been rebuilt. Lech says he is dipping into his 401(k) to afford the legal battle but intends to continue as long as he is able. He says he thinks he has too much bad luck to make it to the Supreme Court but believes that someone else like him will get there.
      “This can’t go on in this country,” he said. “There has to be a limit. There has to be accountability.”

      Sad dump that will make u laugh(45 Pics)